How to Ask Questions (2017-2018)

In current culture, people usually discuss controversial moral and political issues only among like-minded people who do not press challenging questions. In fact, calling on people to justify their moral, political and religious views, especially in contexts where others might disagree, is widely regarded as impolite, even insulting.

However, evidence suggests that people who are regularly called upon to answer the right kinds of questions will exhibit greater intellectual humility and will be more likely to participate constructively in public discussions.

This project team identified a range of questions about effects of and reasons for policies as well as about causes of one’s beliefs in order to investigate which of these questions increase humility and which raise barriers to constructive discourse, such as defensiveness, rationalization and polarization.

The team’s goal was to test the hypothesis that, if students are trained in a culture that encourages people to regularly ask themselves and others the right questions, then they will become better at understanding their own or others’ points of view and, hence, at navigating an ideologically diverse world.

Team members mapped out the various kinds of questions, drawing on philosophical work on argumentation, justification, reasoning and rationalization. They then used surveys and questionnaires to examine how asking various kinds of questions affects people’s confidence in and commitment to their own views as well as their attitudes toward others who disagree.

The team use MTurk to reach a large and diverse population as well as in-person surveys on campus and in the community (including at the North Carolina state fair) to provide confirmation of results and develop a battery of questions through which people can learn to engage thoughtfully and critically with diverse perspectives.

Team members also visited the Right Questions Institute, consulted with the SAGE Center for the Study of Mind and attende the Humility & Conviction in Public Life conference in Hartford, CT, in April 2018.

Timing

Fall 2017 – Spring 2018

Team Outcomes

Political Polarization and Morality (self-published collection of student papers edited by Joshua August Skorburg and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong) Lulu Press, 2018

How to Ask Questions (talk by Kyra Rubin, JJ Moncus, Rose Graves and Sarah Sculco), EHDx, April 19, 2018

How to Ask Questions (poster by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Jesse Summers, Jordy Carpenter, Rose Graves, Sarah Sulco, Kyra Exterovich-Rubin, and JJ Moncus), presented at EHDx, April 19, 2018

Project team website (winner, Best Education & Human Development Website)

Reflections

Research on Empathy Inspires Ph.D. Student to Think Outside the “Humanities Box”

This Team in the News

Seeking Change in How We Talk Politics

Bass Connections Showcase Presents Research Highlights from Durham to Malaysia

Third Annual EHDx Talks Celebrates Student Research

Asking the Tough Questions

Philosophy Student Explores Healthcare Ethics, Political Disagreement

Former Kenan Fellow, Researcher to Teach Ethics at University of Toronto

See related team, How to Cure Political Polarization by Asking Questions (2018-2019)

Bass Connections team members

Team Leaders

  • Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Arts & Sciences-Philosophy
  • Jesse Summers, Kenan Institute for Ethics|Arts & Sciences-Other - A&S

/graduate Team Members

  • Esko (Scott) Brummel, Bioethics and Sci Policy - AM
  • Hannah Read, Philosophy-PHD
  • Valerie-Jean Soon, Philosophy-PHD

/undergraduate Team Members

  • Kyra Exterovich-Rubin, Public Policy Studies (AB)
  • Rose Graves, Statistical Science (BS)
  • Jerry (JJ) Moncus, Mathematics (BS)
  • Sarah Sculco, Philosophy (AB)

/yfaculty/staff Team Members

  • Aaron Ancell, Arts & Sciences-Philosophy
  • Jordan Carpenter, Kenan Institute for Ethics
  • Joshua Skorburg, Arts & Sciences-Philosophy